11 November 2007

Taking a Page from the Bush-Cheney Playbook?

A recent appearance by Hillary Clinton at an Iowa forum last week saw her fielding at least one question planted in the audience by her campaign staff beforehand, The Associated Press reports.

An aide to the New York senator asked an audience member, a student at Grinnell College, to pitch a question to the Democratic presidential front-runner about global warming, the AP article said.

The college's student newspaper broke the story, after interviewing the student.

Various permutations of such a stunt have repeatedly been attributed to the Bush-Cheney administration.

Examples include:

  • Pre-arranged questions at a October 2005 videoconference between the president and troops in Iraq (commented on here and here);
  • A series of allegedly staged and scripted "Town Hall" meetings on Social Security (mentioned here, here, here and here);
  • A fake October press conference rigged by FEMA officials and staffers, as perhaps the most recent episode (AP story here).
The 2000 and 2004 elections, meanwhile, featured allegations of carefully screened and orchestrated "public" events. While some were arranged by the campaign, an official 2004 Fourth of July visit to West Virginia's Capitol sparked a recently settled lawsuit (background also here).

The lawsuit, in turn, helped yield a heavily redacted Presidential Advance Manual that details tactics deployed to ferret out and and deal with agitators real or perceived (That visit also included a softball interview with local media).

During her August visit to the Mountain State, Clinton held a Town Hall-style meeting, an hour-long event at West Virginia State University.

At least one question wasn't planted: the one about Iraq posed by Rev. Jim Lewis, shortly after Clinton ignored the prayer vigil he and West Virginia Patriots for Peace held outside her downtown Charleston fundraiser.

Lewis pressed her about withdrawing U.S. combat troops from Iraq. Members of that audience also asked her about:
  • Health care (that question came from an AARP member as part of its Divided We Fail campaign, which is appealing to all the presidential candidates);
  • China (the trade imbalance, the buying of U.S. debt and the rash of tainted imported consumer products);
  • The status of women in the U.S. (unequal pay);
  • Illegal immigration (posed by a student on behalf of those who follow the naturalization process).
Phony baloney public events appear to be all the rage these days. Consider Sen. John McCain's observations of "carefully staged campaign events" by Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger after he helped the California Republican promote November 2005 ballot initiatives.

And in Japan, former Prime Minister Shinzo Abe's administration was caught staging Town Hall meetings late last year.

5 comments:

Anonymous said...

So much for being a "phony" reporter:

1. 500 articles as a White House correspondent over a period of two years that have never been successfully challenged for accuracy.
2. Personal attacks that have never been confirmed or proven.
3. Accepted into membership in the National Press Club in 2006.
4. Published book in September 2007.
5. Seated at head table at National Press Club luncheon featuring Lynne Cheney, joined by Vice President Dick Cheney in October 2007.
6. Book featured at National Press Club book fair in November 2007.
7. Accepted into membership in the Society of Professional Journalists in November 2007.

Anonymous said...

Well, Jeff, James, or whoever, the problem is that all of your articles have come since your 1st day as a White House reporter. How does someone with zero experience and no ties to any news organization get entree to the White House Press Briefing?!?!? Sounds suspiciously like a plant. Which would make wingnuts hypocrites (as if this incident was required) and, therefore the thesis of the post correct.

clear eyes said...

Way to deflect the criticism away from Hillary who does have a history of planting questions and carefully orchestrating nearly all appearances. Citing one apearance where an unauthorized question snuck through doesn't serve as the complete coverup which apparently was intended by this blog entry.

Anonymous said...

If you are looking for bias keeping looking elsewhere. I challenge you to find another political news blog out there that is more fair and balanced than LWAM. So please take your whining to a more interested audience. Aren't there enough Republican blogs out there for you?

clear eyes said...

Bias is displayed not only by statements made, but by the statements left unmade and even by the subjects chosen to comment on. Balance would require that both sides be presented equally. Very few individuals are capable of that due to their own personal perspective. Presenting information to balance your own personal beliefs and biases is very difficult. I believe that's why most news articles are slanted the way they are. We shouldn't expect anything more from a personal blog.